Why can’t America have high-speed trains? - 为什么美国没有高铁？

本页面只读。您可以查看源文件，但不能更改它。如果您觉得这是系统错误，请联系管理员。
====== Why can’t America have high-speed trains? - 为什么美国没有高铁？ ======

//Written by Michael Smart\\ May 4, 2015//

//Edited and translated by Troy Liu //\\ //December 18, 2020//

<span lo>This article is reprinted from [[https://us.cnn.com/2015/05/03/opinions/smart-high-speed-trains-america/index.html | CNN]]. Michael Smart is an assistant professor of transportation planning at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University. The views expressed are his own. \\ 本文转载自美国有线电视新闻网。迈克尔·斯玛特是罗格斯大学爱德华·布洛斯坦规划与公共政策学院交通运输计划的助理教授。</span>

<div center round info 90%>
You may notice some yellow <span hi>highlighted words</span> in the text that may be unfamiliar to you. There are explanations and pronunciation hints for these words at the bottom of the page. Good luck! :-D

你或许留意到了正文中的一些<span hi>黄色高亮单词</span>，这些单词可能有些难。页面底部有这些单词的释义和发音提示。祝好运！:-D
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a <span hi>fraction</span> of the time it would take to drive. On the surface, that <span hi>tantalizing</span> prospect took a step closer with the news last month that a Japanese maglev train had reached a top speed of close to 400 mph[(译者注：约643.73公里/小时。)], breaking its own world record in the process.
</div>

<div half column>
想象一下从纽约到洛杉矶，可以不用坐飞机，就能在比开车还短的时间内到达。从表面上看，这一诱人的展望因为上个月的新闻而更进一步：日本的磁悬浮时速已接近400英里[(#1)]每小时，并在此过程中打破了它自己原先的世界纪录。
</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
And the sight of futuristic-looking trains whizzing past platforms at hundreds of miles per hour isn’t confined to Japan: China, France and Spain, to name a few, have their own high-speed rail networks. Indeed, while these bullet trains may look futuristic, they have been around for decades; they’re a tried and tested technology that the Japanese debuted over 50 years ago.
</div>

<div half column>
未来感十足的列车以每小时数百英里的速度从站台上飞驰而过，这种景象并不限于日本。中国、法国和西班牙等国都有自己的高速铁路网。事实上，虽然这些子弹列车看起来很未来主义，但它们已经存在了几十年；它们是日本人在50多年前首次亮相的一项久经考验的技术。
</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
So surely it’s only a matter of time before large numbers of U.S. passengers are doing a daily commute to New York from Washington and Boston in about the time it would take them to drive to work in their own cities, right? 
</div>

<div half column>
因此，大量美国乘客每天从华盛顿和波士顿到纽约的通勤时间与他们在自己城市开车上班的时间差不多，这肯定只是时间问题，对吗？
</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Not anytime soon.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
While several countries have undertaken the tough work of raising the money to invest in bullet trains, it’s unlikely the United States will ever see the vast network of high-speed trains that blanket other countries. Indeed, passenger rail service in the United States lags behind much of the rest of the developed world, for several reasons.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
For a start, much of the United States is not exactly an ideal market for high-speed rail. Compared to places where rail really flourishes – Japan and Western Europe, for instance – the United States is geographically vast. As a result, in much of the country, cities are far enough apart that air travel provides significant time savings, even compared to some of the fastest trains.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
The layout of cities matters, too. When you arrive in Tokyo, Paris or Barcelona, it’s often convenient (and even pleasant) to walk to your final destination. When it’s not, a fast and frequent mass transportation system awaits to whisk you away. This is not the case in many American cities, where arriving by train typically means jumping into a cab or renting a car for the last leg of your journey. Simply put, in many sprawling U.S. cities, getting to your destination by train can still mean you’ve got quite a way yet to get home. We could change that. And we probably should. But we’re not there yet.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Still, there are several parts of the United States where high-speed rail makes a great deal of sense.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
The Northeast Corridor (Boston-New York-Washington) comes in at the top of just about every list of potential candidates for high-speed rail, with the distances involved being considered within the “Goldilocks” zone for fast trains. For example, at just over 200 miles from New York to both Boston and Washington, fast trains could compete with even faster airplanes by offering centrally located stations and providing an alternative to the hassle of airport security lines. These cities are dense, have strong downtowns, and extensive mass transit systems once you arrive.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Just as importantly, rail on the Northeast Corridor can also compete with driving, mainly because traffic congestion makes driving in the region so slow and unreliable, while tolls and parking costs can make it an expensive and time-consuming option. Rail in the northeast even has a great track record; after Amtrak’s almost-high-speed Acela service began on the Northeast Corridor in 2000, ridership exploded, quickly outstripping air travel between New York and Washington.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
However, the biggest barrier to improved rail service in the United States is simply the lack of political will. At the federal level, support for passenger rail service has languished and Washington has devolved decision-making (and increasingly, funding) to the states. With the nation’s transportation trust fund nearly broke and no permanent solution in sight, it seems unlikely the federal government will champion high-speed rail – a costly endeavor – in the near future.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Without leadership from the federal government, the states are largely in control. Yet many of the most promising corridors for high-speed rail cross state lines, making it difficult to plan for better rail service. In 2009, the Obama administration awarded nearly a billion dollars of stimulus money to plan and upgrade a high-speed rail line connecting Chicago to Milwaukee and Madison. A year later, Scott Walker, the newly elected governor of Wisconsin, rejected his state’s portion of the money and the project was, for the time being, at least, derailed. (The money quickly found its way to a grateful California for its high-speed rail line.)
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Still, all is not lost for those hoping to see high-speed rail in the United States.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
California is committed to building its high-speed rail link between San Francisco and Los Angeles, paying for the line largely with state money raised by a new cap-and-trade market on carbon emissions. Several privately funded projects are also in the planning stages. For instance, a Dallas-to-Houston line promises 205 mph service in 2021 without a single dollar from the taxpayer. Meanwhile, another private company has already begun construction on a Miami-to-Orlando line with a more modest speed of 125 mph, with service expected to begin in 2017.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
All this points to how high-speed rail will likely progress in the United States: piecemeal. It is doubtful that we will have a nationwide system of fast trains soon. And this is not necessarily a bad thing; through a combination of private and public action, we should target markets where high-speed rail makes sense. That means looking for shorter corridors connecting dense places with existing mass transit infrastructure. 
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
High-speed rail won’t be cheap, so we’ll have to choose wisely. Some of the most promising corridors are also the most expensive; Amtrak estimates upgrading the Northeast Corridor to true high-speed rail would cost upward of $150 billion. Such an undertaking requires careful consideration of the economic, environmental and other costs and benefits of individual projects. But more importantly, it requires the kind of long-term planning that seems to have become vanishingly rare.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

<div group>
<div half column>
Thankfully, high-speed rail doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing approach. And while given the choice I would rather be riding Japan’s speeding bullet trains, even the incremental improvements we’ve seen in services like Amtrak’s Acela can make rail travel a lot more appealing for the hundreds of thousands of passengers who rely on it every year.
</div>

<div half column>

</div>
</div>

==== Words - 词汇 ====
==== Notes - 脚注 ====
	© 2020 2Socks.net
	Made with in Shanghai.